Imperium in imperio – ‘a state within a state’

Masonic coat-of-arms used by Grand Lodge of England was a Jewish design. Lucien Wolf stated it was: ‘an attempt to display heraldically the various forms of the cherubim pictured in the second vision of Ezekiel – an ox, man, lion and eagle where all belong to the highest and most mystical domain of Hebrew symbolism’

 Freemasonry has been referred to as a ‘State within a State’ – an Imperium in Imperio, more correctly a government, power, or sovereignty within a government, power, or sovereignty; such a body is illegal under the British Constitution. All the top grades of Freemasonry are Jewish begging the question whether Israel is the hidden State, a position that since 9/11 is evident in American foreign policy as a political and religious war in the globalisation “road map” is being fought.

Over a period of thirty years I collected evidence in my case of Human Rights violations mainly committed in British Courts of Law, in relation to my research and books, but particularly over the mechanism for cancer I formulated (The Cancer Files). No complaints avenues of redress including the European Court would dare confront the case of “conflict of interest” that I presented, thus allowing a ‘state within a state’ to exist even in law, repeatedly violating ~Article 6 of The Human Rights Act. There was a certain irony if not hypocrisy watching recently The Rt. Hon. The Baroness Hale of Richmond upholding the Constitution in the Supreme Court and the Attorney General Geoffrey Cox telling MPs “parliament is a disgrace” – I believe I gave a similar description of the law in the UK, in my (unanswered) letter to him (Cox letter).

The Spectator (21.09.2019) remarked: ‘Who runs Britain?’ well there’s a valid question. ‘When Boris Johnson’s lawyers made their case in front of the Supreme Court this week, defending his right to prorogue parliament, they in effect brought it back to this simple question. This was a controversy for politicians to settle, not courts. Judges, they said, should think twice about ‘entering the political arena’ and unsettling the UK’s ‘careful constitutional and political balance.’ Well who knows what vested interests in terms of Freemasonry who have been meddling in politics for centuries, lay there?

Historically high initiates of Freemasonry acknowledged all the top grades of Freemasonry are Jewish (Secret History of European Union vol. 1). The Jewish writer Bernard Lazane noted there were Jews around the cradle of Freemasonry and the Masonic coat-of-arms used by Grand Lodge of England was a Jewish design. Lucien Wolf stated it was: ‘an attempt to display heraldically the various forms of the cherubim pictured in the second vision of Ezekiel – an ox, man, lion and eagle where all belong to the highest and most mystical domain of Hebrew symbolism’ (Theatre Earth vol.2, p. 45)

A whistle-blower and past member of Freemasonry also revealed that the majority of Freemasons are Conservatives: “…As for politics they don’t need to talk about it: they’re nearly all Conservatives…Freemasonry is a mechanism of social control. It’s a feudal pyramid…Have you ever thought why the police are so cultivated by Freemasonry? Lawyers, local government officials and businessmen are well represented. By drawing these kinds of people into the network, the landed aristocracy and big business filter their values down through the social structure. One of the first things you are taught in Freemasonry is to obey rank…you can forget about merit, Freemasonry is all about subordination…” (The Secret History of European Union v.2, p. 109).

“…I was particularly disturbed by the attitudes of top Masons. I got to know several who are high Court judges. In private they talk as if ordinary people are an expendable nuisance…these people say appalling things about the working man…” (The Secret History of the European Union v.2, p. 108).

Recently I disclosed in my research, a Masonic Lodge was being held in Westminster – the heart of government and yet this had gone unchallenged, until the Guardian newspaper picked up the research, illustrating the power held by this organisation. I wrote to The Guardian including an article by Tom King in The Times [27th Dec. 2017 – ‘Mafia join Freemasons to ‘do deals’ with judiciary’]. The resulting banner headline in The Guardian (Feb. 5th 2018) was entitled: ‘Secret Freemasons’ lodges for MPs and journalists revealed’. After the so-called “Exclusive” The Guardian made a quick climb down, following United Grand Lodge’s two full page advertisements in The Telegraph and The Times – ‘Enough is Enough’ [ 8th Feb. 2018]. This was followed by a placatory right of reply by Grand Lodge [Ian Cobain -9th Feb. 2018 – Freemasons have been unfairly stigmatised says Grand Lodge Chief’].   This should have been thoroughly investigated as Freemasonry claims to be non-political and non-religious; both claims based on my research are false.

The Guardian “exclusive”

Tony Blair’s New Labour Party, received large donations from wealthy Jewish businessmen and Michael Levy (later Lord Levy) helped to raise £22 million for Blair’s election campaign. Jewish influence over media, law and government far exceeds the numbers represented in the population.

David Cameron with Tony Blair who wears the Jewish kippah (domed hat)

I contacted Jack Straw New Labour’s Justice Secretary in 2009 with regard to my case and the long list of Human Rights violations in courts of law. Twelve years previously, shortly before the 1997 general election, Jack Straw said that freemasonry should be a “declarable and registrable interest” for members of the judiciary. Labour won and a rule was introduced saying that anyone who was made a judge or a magistrate had to declare whether or not they were a mason.

Tony Blair with Michael Levy (later Lord)

In 2009 with an election looming Straw issued a statement saying that he was scrapping the rule about freemasonry declarations that he played a role in introducing. What happened was that the masons threatened to take the government to court, over violation of their Human Rights. There was also the unstated issue of financing the election campaign.

President Trump has supported highly controversial actions by Benjamin Netanyahu, currently hanging on to his premiership of Israel after an inconclusive election. Emboldened by Trump’s decision to move the American Embassy to Jerusalem, Israeli settlers hastened their takeover of more and more Palestinian territory in the areas under Israeli administration including land around the Palestinian authority’s administrative centre of Ramallah. Netanyahu also claimed that on re-election he would annex one-third of the West Bank, including the Jordan Valley, the West Bank’s most fertile area.

What is surprising in all these continuing illegal actions is that Israel (like Freemasonry) is allowed to get away with it. The EU and Britain have remained virtually silent. As I have covered in the past two Blogs, Israel is central to the west’s globalisation plan. Zionists believe in a sovereign Israeli state which will ultimately be the centre of a world government. A combination of Israeli nationalism and a belief that they are “God’s chosen people”: “The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will obtain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and the establishment of a World Republic” (Baruch Levy writing to Karl Marx).

‘The Secret History of European Union’ (2 volumes) unequivocally provides evidence which proves Freemasonry (and branches) was the hidden force behind the French Revolution 1789- 1794 (and murder of Europe’s monarchies), which paved the way for a federal European Union. The majority of Freemasons on a ‘need to know’ basis had no idea of the true goals, which were held secretly by a few high initiates. The question becomes was that directing power Jewish or the higher initiate degrees of Freemasonry?

Hitler of course confronted the Jewish power and Freemasonry (The Secret History of European Union vol. 1). Prior to the Holocaust the front page of The Daily Express (24.03.1933) stated: ‘Fourteen million Jews stand together as one man, to declare war against Germany. The Jewish wholesaler with forsake his firm, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his commerce, and the pauper his pitiful shed in order to join together in a holy war against Hitler’s people” (author’s emphasis).

In the Bush-Iraq war in 2003, Bush was persuaded by the Neoconservatives, who were loyal to Israel, to believe he was engaged in a “Holy War” and mission from God against “evil doers” – the “axis of evil”: the original “axis of evil” list, pronounced by US President George W Bush in 2002, comprised Iraq, Iran and North Korea. That list it appears is still operational, as witnessed by recent events involving Saudi Arabia and Iran (2019).

Bush in his “holy war”

America acted in a proxy war on behalf of Israel’s foreign policy in the Iraq war, illustrating ‘a state within a state.’  The strategy of Israel has been one of disguised invasion. The question I posed in my research, was whether this “holy war” is following the script of Revelations? There is a psychological case, represented by a powerful secret group which is directing events, in order to fulfill the prophesy. A further question arose – is that group committed to Britain’s downfall and decline? I have in my research clearly identified two Jewish priesthoods, two Jerusalem’s (one in the Middle East and one in Scotland) and two interpretations of the Rose Croix initiation levels (Secret History of European Union vol.2, p.361).

Lodge Mother Kilwinning is a Masonic Lodge in Kilwinning, Scotland, under the auspices of the Grand Lodge of Scotland. It is number 0 (referred to as “nothing” and not zero) on the Roll, and is reputed to be the oldest Lodge not only in Scotland, but the world. It is thus styled The Mother Lodge of Scotland attributing its origins to the 12th Century, and is often called Mother Kilwinning.
 

One cannot hope to understand the Book of Revelations, in The Bible, until one has understood the history of Christianity, which incorporates the Patriarchs, but also revealed in my research events involving the Early and Late Minoans in Crete. The archetypes when decoded reveal the true meaning. Having decoded the archetypes (Theatre Earth vol.1 and 2), clearly the final battle of Revelations, is really a battle of competing priesthoods, which surfaced in the events of the alleged crucifixion of the sun-king Jesus.

The Pedigree for the Jesus family given in the English College of Arms shows a Celtic lineage (Theatre Earth vol. 1, p.195) which is the basis of the priesthood of the secret Celtic Church (Secret History of European Union vol. 1). Scotland then is the second Jerusalem, which has been vigorously covered up. I decoded the archetypes presented on the summer smoking room floor at Cardiff castle, Wales UK; where the design by a chevalier Kadosch (the final degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry) shows political and religious goals of a world order; and where “New Jerusalem” is clearly marked (Theatre Earth vol. 2, p.278; TE vol. 1).

The theft of the Woman’s Mysteries in Early Minoan Crete, meant they were hidden and crucially misunderstood by the Late Minoans, who I claim came from Scotland and represented a specific Celtic Judaic priesthood. These Mysteries were meant as a warning to man but have become central to a future religion. The Order of the Rosy Cross even admit the Woman (not mentioning her of course as all secret groups are patriarchal) as source: ”Our philosophy is not a new invention, but as Adam after his fall hath received it (author: named as Eve in The Bible) and as Moses and Solomon used it – wherein Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras and others that did hit the mark and wherein Enoch, Abraham, Moses and Solomon did excel (Secret History of European Union vol. 1, p.357 – emphasis author’s).

The stolen mysteries involved cosmological science in which man becomes trapped in never ending cycles. I have explained the science in Theatre Earth vol. 3.The Mysteries have been used to gain power instead of warning. The Jewish Cabala distinctly states that Israel alone is to possess the future of the world. Whilst the Talmud even excludes the lost tribes: “the ten tribes have no share in the world to come” (Secret History of European Union vol. 1, p.357).

The Jewish Chronicle on March 26th, 1937 claimed: ‘’We Jews claim that we possess a Universal Religion, a faith whose foundations we believe will one day be accepted by all mankind (Secret History of European Union vol. 1, p.356). The religious goal has paralleled a political goal. It was in 1942 that the occult magazine Vaincre produced an illustration of a Knight (Rose Croix) riding down the road towards the sun, with the road labelled “United States of the West” – European Union (Secret History of European Union vol.1, p.184).

James Goldsmith campaigning for the Referendum Party

It was the Jewish billionaire financier Sir James Goldsmith and his Referendum Party, which became known as the Referendum Movement which became active in the United Kingdom from 1994 to 1997. The Party called for a referendum on whether the British electorate wanted to be part of a federal European state or to revert to being a sovereign nation that was part of a European free-trade bloc without wider political functions. Goldsmith died in July 1997, and the party disbanded shortly afterward. Some of its supporters reformed as a Eurosceptic pressure group called the Democracy Movement while many others joined Eurosceptic political parties like the UK Independence Party and the Democratic Party. Goldsmith’s Referendum Party got people into the idea of voting for a pure anti-European party, breaking down old party loyalties and paving the way for the Farage-led Ukip “insurgency” a decade or so on. The question becomes as to whether ‘Leave’ or ‘Remain’ is really an issue of whether Britain should move closer to the U.S- Israeli partnership post Brexit, or remain committed to Europe.

To question either Freemasonry or Israeli foreign policy invites in the latter accusations of Antisemitism. The Race Relations Act of 1965 was introduced to parliament by the Russian Jew Frank Soskice (Labour Attorney General) whose father was the exiled Russian revolutionary journalist David Soskice. Further Race Relations Acts were devised by the Board of Jewish Deputies.

‘Section 6 of the Race Relations Act, 1965, dealing with incitement to racial hatred, may be amended and strengthened following representations made by the Attorney-General, Mr Sam Silkin, QC, by the Board of Deputies’. And: ‘In the view of the Board’s Jewish Defense and Group Relations Committee, the weakness of section is its present requirement that ‘intent’ to stir up racial hatred must be proven for any prosecution to succeed’ (Jewish Chronicle 17th Jan. 1975). So here we have a Jewish Attorney-General receiving instructions from the Jewish Board of Deputies. Secrecy is another strategy of secret groups so it is interesting that in the same issue of The Jewish Chronicle is to be found the editorial stating that the amendment to the law “would better have been achieved by less public means.”

Balfour’s letter to Lord Rothschild

It is curious too how the 1976 Race Relations Act was first amended and then passed in the Commons by default, with only 132 of the 635 members present; 124 Labour and Liberal MPs voted for the bill with eight Tories against. This means that 500 MPs stayed away, fearing career repercussions if they voted against the Board of Jewish Deputies wishes – ‘a state within a state.’ This reminds one of the Balfour Declaration, when Balfour was pressurised by Rothschild to sign it, which set in motion the formation of the state of Israel. Balfour later admitted he signed as he did not want to place “the powerful force of international Jewry against us” (Theatre Earth vol. 1, p.474 -495) – ‘a state within a state.’

Neville Nagler, a synagogue official and head of the Home Office Department responsible for race relations (1970s -1980s) drafted the texts, whenever a cabinet minister made a speech on the subject of race relations. Nagler in turn consulted with the Jewish Board of Deputies officials such as Geoffrey Bindman and Anthony Lester. Incidentally it is no wonder a rather curt if not rude reply came from the Human Rights lawyer Bindman to your author, regarding Masonic violations of Human Rights. In 1991 Nagler became Chief Executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews.

The Public Order Act of 1986 by Conservative Home Secretary, a Jewish immigrant from Lithuania Leon Brittanisky (Leon Brittan), assisted by another Lithuanian Jew and cousin Malcolm Rivkind (Malcom Rifkind); set out to penalise any criticism of Jewish policy. It is illegal and violates a number of Human Rights if not academic research. Every avenue of freedom of speech was being closed down and with it the truth. The ability to question Israeli foreign policy, the question of the Palestinians and incessant wars was off limits and with it the political and religious goals.

Tony Blair the previous New Labour Party leader and Prime Minister toed the line with Israeli foreign policy in Bush’s Iraq war. Blair was a close friend of Eldred Tabachnik, president of the Jewish Board of Deputies. Jack Straw (one-eighth Jewish) succeeded Tory Home Secretary, Michael Howard, who was identified by the Independent on Sunday, 14.04 1996 as born Michael Hecht, son of a Jewish refugee from Romania.

Tabachnik persuaded the Labour Party to restrict freedom of speech on the subject of the Holocaust. There is a great deal of undisclosed evidence on this event, which the Zionists in particular do not wish to be made open to the general public. Secrecy is the reason wars are fought and is a sign of wrong-doing – if there is nothing to hide, one does not need secrecy.

The relationship of the EU with Israel was put under strain in 2008, when the proposal of an upgrade to the EU-Israel Association Agreement, was rejected in favor of stricter amendments. Luisa Morgantini then vice-president of the European Parliament stated: “It’s time for the Israeli government to stop considering itself above the law and start respecting it.” One could say the same of Freemasonry in its upper grades. Whilst the Parliament rejected the upgrade In 2002 the voting to suspend the EU-Israel Agreement, due to Israel’s violation of Human Rights, all 27 ministers voted unanimously to approve it, proving at least how undemocratic the EU is, where Parliament has no powers and is overridden by the Commission and Council (see Blog ‘Dangerous political model of the EU’).

The upgrade included and examination of possible Israeli integration into the European single market: “The upgrade is also welcome for the economic fruits it promises to bring to an already robust partnership as the EU is Israel’s major partner.” In light of Israel’s foreign policy and continuing wars, this was a dangerous consideration, particularly given the un-elected apex of European Union and its proposals for a European Army.

In 2002 the Iraq war plans in America were being completed by ‘a state within a state’ – the neoconservatives, with their close affiliation to Israel. The fear of widespread terrorism had flooded the media, whilst a “sexed-up dossier” claimed weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, which ultimately led to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. It contained a number of allegations according to which Iraq not only possessed WMD, but chemical weapons and biological weapons. The dossier even alleged that Iraq had reconstituted its nuclear weapons programme. Without exception, all of the allegations included within the Dossier have been since proven to be false (a fuller account see last two blogs).

The “sexed up” dossier that led Britain to war with Iraq

In 1995 Israel and Europe had signed an agreement to establish lasting relations, based on “reciprocity and partnership.” On the first page, both sides declared a commitment to “the common values that they share.” If democracy was implied then the EU is certainly not democratic at its apex. The agreement also proposed that “observance of Human Rights and democracy” be upheld – evidently this did not extend to the Palestinians. The Trade Deal of Israel with the EU allowed it to export its own goods to Europe either duty free or at reduced rates. The deal was to reward Israel for its participation in the Oslo Peace Process (which has been subsequently violated).

The Oslo Accords are a set of agreements between the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization: the Oslo I Accord, signed in Washington, D.C., in 1993; and the Oslo II Accord, signed in Taba, Egypt, in 1995. 

Not only did Israel renege on Human Rights and the Peace process, but in April 2001 a London Guardian reporter (Brian Whitaker) noted that Israel had blatantly “cheated and lied and abused the trust” it had in trade agreements with European nations. No sooner had the ink dried on Shimon Peres (previous Prime Minister Israel) signature than Israel began to cheat. In 1997 as a result of complaints, the European Commission sent a delegation to Israel to find out why Brazilian orange juice arriving in Europe had been certified as Israeli in order to qualify for preferential rates. The problem the delegation concluded went way beyond orange juice and Israeli customs officials simply could not be trusted.

The problem was so serious the report said, that ‘the validity of ALL preferential certificates issued by Israel for ALL products’ was in doubt.’ Israel was systematically re-labeling produce from other countries as Israeli. Also products from illegal Israeli settlements (and therefore not legally counted) were being re-labelled within Israel’s (legally) internationally recognized borders. The report went on to say ‘The unfair practices employed against Palestinian trade with Europe are further evidence of Israel’s lack of commitment to a genuine partnership.’

When European countries started to boycott Israeli produce/goods, Israel disregarding the Human Rights of the Palestinians, took their case to the international human rights court. It was inevitable that Israel’s violation of the agreements and laws would be overlooked by the court. Just as in my case to that court, they could not even uphold their own stated laws on the matter – leading me to coin the term ‘Mickey Mouse Court’. The Council of Europe’s European Court of Human Rights upheld a French ruling that it was illegal and discriminatory to boycott Israeli goods, and that making it illegal to call for a boycott of Israeli goods did not constitute a violation of one’s freedom of expression. Any other country found violating agreements would have been suspended.

When Jack Straw dropped the rule in 2009 that freemasonry should be a “declarable and registrable interest” for members of the judiciary, he justified that in a ministerial statement: ‘The United Grand Lodge of England made representations in May. They drew attention to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Grande Oriente d’Italia di Palazzo Guistiniani v Italy (no 1) and Grande Oriente d’Italia di Palazzo Guistiniani v Italy (no 2) and indicated that they might seek judicially to review the application of the policy to the judiciary. In the light of my consideration of those representations I decided to review the policy. As a result of this review we have decided to end the current policy of requiring applicants for judicial office to declare membership of the freemasons.

The review of the policy operating since 1998 has shown no evidence of impropriety or malpractice within the judiciary as a result of a judge being a Freemason and in my judgment; therefore, it would be disproportionate to continue the collection or retention of this information.’ This completely disregarded (naturally) the evidence I forwarded to Jack Straw. In short the Freemasons threatened the Human Rights Act and privacy clauses – we must of course respect their Human Rights.

In the name of security Israel has invaded other countries and when faced with retaliation, claims “terrorism” as the reason for the attacks. This should warrant concern, if not a realization that the world will no longer tolerate these incessant wars, based on a plan of political and religious globalisation, with the death and starvation of millions. A two state solution would have resolved matters with Israel and the Palestinians. The Zionist hope of a greater Israel should fade into history: “When a Jew, in America or in South Africa, talks to his Jewish companions about ‘our’ government, he means the government of Israel” (David Ben-Gurion – former Israeli Prime Minister). 

When Trump moved the American Embassy to Jerusalem, he knew there would be no backlash from US Christians or indeed Israelis, who were delighted. The powerful US pro-Israeli lobbying group represents 40 million Christians and is called Christians for Israel, led by the millionaire Rev John Hagee, a close friend of Netanyahu. These Christians insisted Israel must have the whole of Jerusalem. Hagee declared: “Turning part or all of Jerusalem over to the Palestinians would be tantamount to turning it over to the Taliban.”

Barack Obama toed the Israeli lobby line but Hilary Clinton called for “an undivided Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.” Both Obama and Clinton received money from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Rabbi Eric Yoffie, the president of the Union for Reform Judaism, the largest Jewish religious organisation in the United States, with over 1.5 million members denounced Hagee and his followers for religious extremism.

Barack Obama wearing the kippah at the west wall in Jerusalem

In 2011 Nicolas Sarkozy was embroiled in a diplomatic row after being overheard calling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a liar; being unaware that journalists were listening. Sarkozy told Barak Obama: “Netanyahu, I can’t stand him. He’s a liar”. Obama replied: “You are sick of him, but I have to deal with him every day”. The obvious question that nobody asked was why was Netanyahu in contact every day with the president of a super-power and why did Obama “have to deal with him”? (‘a state within a state’).

Charles wearing the kippah

It is interesting to speculate whether, it was Jewish funding that got Trump the presidency and whether, Jerusalem was the pay-back? Another question arises with regards to his son-in-law Jared Corey Kushner who is currently senior adviser to his father-in-law, Donald Trump. Kushner is the elder son of the former real-estate developer Charles Kushner, the son of Jewish immigrants from the USSR, and is married to Ivanka Trump, President Trump’s daughter and fellow adviser. As a result of his father’s conviction for fraud and incarceration, Kushner took over management of his father’s real estate company Kushner Companies, which launched his business career. During the 2016 Trump presidential campaign, Kushner helped develop and run Trump’s digital media strategy.

There are question marks here over Nigel Farage, previous leader of the British Brexit Party who was friends with Steve Bannon and it was questioned how far Brexit came under the influence of a company called Cambridge Analytica. Bannon was a vice President of the British consultancy firm of Cambridge Analytica, a company that was involved with the psycho-profiling of swing voters using Facebook data of members without their permission (Blog: Power and its protection by secrecy).

Steve Bannon vice President of the British consultancy firm
of Cambridge Analytica

On January 9, 2017, he was named as a senior White House advisor. Kushner operated on a temporary security clearance for more than a year, after which Trump ordered John Kelly to grant Kushner a top-secret clearance. Trump inappropriately put Kushner in charge of brokering peace in Israeli–Palestinian conflict, as well as making deals with foreign countries; although in what way he is in charge is unclear. As Israel has no intention of giving up land, then it was a cynical move. On August 24, 2017, Kushner traveled to Israel to talk to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with whom Kushner has longstanding personal links and family ties, causing Palestinians to distrust him.

Jared Corey Kushner with wife Ivanka and Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman of Saudi Arabia

Kushner’s contacts with Russian officials came under scrutiny as part of the larger federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Robert Mueller investigated not only Russian meetings between Trump associates including Kushner but also with George Nader, an emissary representing the crown princes of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia. It seems rather co-incidental that a looming war with Iran has arisen and Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman has been able to side-winder his way out of the murder of Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi the Saudi Arabian dissident, author, columnist for The Washington Post, and a general manager and editor-in-chief of Al-Arab News Channel who was assassinated at the Saudi embassy in Istanbul Turkey in 2018. Of course Iran was on the neoconservative list of “axis of evil,” after Iraq.

Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi the Saudi Arabian dissident who was murdered

 In August 2016, Nader offered help to the Trump presidential campaign. In December 2016, Nader attended a New York meeting between the United Arab Emirates officials and Kushner, Michael Flynn and Steve Bannon. Mueller is also investigating Kushner’s possible ties to Qatar, Israel and China.

We would like to think that the Jewish lobby in the UK does not control Parliament, but under Tony Blair look how that ended. Blair’s tenure as Prime Minister was a disaster, both for the UK and Iraq. One of Blair’s first acts on becoming an MP in 1983 was to join Labour Friends of Israel. These organisations, like that of Freemasonry are there to provide assistance particularly funding and career progression; a variant form of the ‘old boys’ network.’ Blair needed funds, in order to limit funding influence of the trade unions, which happened under Old Labour.

In 1999, Eldred Tabachnik, Q.C., former president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews introduced Blair to Michael Levy (later Lord) and fundraiser for Jewish and Israeli causes, a member of the Jewish Agency World Board of Governors, and a trustee of the Holocaust Educational Trust.

According to Andrew Porter of The Business, Levy expressed his willingness “to raise large sums of money for the party” if there was a “tacit understanding that Labour would never again while Blair was leader, be anti-Israel.” Levy by his own admission is “a leading international Zionist”.

Blair In joining Bush’s proxy war in line with Israel’s foreign policy, kept to his agreement. It was Levy who financed Blair’s campaign in the 1997 General Election. It is notable that Jeremy Corbyn has returned to the trade unions, as Old Labour and what people interpret as its communist roots. As I noted however he is poorly informed (revisionist history) on the causation of the Russian Revolution (The Secret History of European Union vol. 1, p. 249). Accusations of Antisemitism have surrounded his tenure as leader of Old Labour.

It was the Jewish property developer David Abrahams, who secretly funded New Labour under Tony Blair. This was subsequently deemed to be unlawful by former Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Abrahams later admitted to the Jewish Chronicle, he did not want “Jewish money” and New Labour to be linked, thinking it would imply a Jewish conspiracy. How else can one describe the Iraq war if not a neoconservative conspiracy?

Abrahams was at the time in close contact with Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s election campaign adviser, Jon Mendelsohn, an ex-chairman of the lobby group Labour Friends of Israel. Lord Sainsbury gave a million pounds and Levy by 2001 had raised £15 million.  What is reprehensible was the media after discovering these secret donations, failed to join up the dots or report the facts.

The Sunday Herald in America uncovered a secret blueprint for US global domination which revealed that President Bush and his cabinet consisting mainly of neoconservatives were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to secure “regime change” even before he took power in a disputed election in January 2001. The document was the neoconservative agenda entitled: ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses: strategies, Forces and Resources for a New Century’ written in September 2000, written by the pro-Israeli neoconservative think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC – see my last two Blogs).

The funding of Tony Blair, the PNAC and events of 9/11 followed by Iraq (and now Iran on the “axis of evil” list) certainly does have a considerable conspiratorial whiff about it. The PNAC document referred to key allies such as the UK as: “the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership.” The document also revealed worries that Europe could rival the USA. I did question whether mass immigration from war zones, was seen as a political tool to break up the EU. The report also spotlighted China for ‘regime change’ saying “it is time to increase the presence of American forces in Southeast Asia.”

The report also scarily discussed America developing biological weapons in the future (although banned presently): “New methods of attack – electronic, ‘non-lethal’, biological – will be more widely available….combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes…Advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool” (Author’s emphasis – see also my Blog on GMO organisms). You might say well the neoconservatives no longer are in power, but then the “axis of evil” is still being pursued with Iran.

The genotype is the genetic constitution of an individual organism. Hitler with his Aryan race project was concerned with genotypes and ironically so are the Zionists. It raises the specter again of the science of eugenics – improving a population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics.

Gordon Brown

Gordon Brown (un-elected) followed Tony Blair after he stood down – another UK democracy embarrassment.  Brown declared himself as a “proud member of Labour Friends of Israel over three decades.” Brown’s father spent many weeks in Israel over a period of twenty years, when he was chairman of the Church of Scotland’s Israel Committee. Brown evidently was educated in revisionist history: “I was brought up impressed by the sufferings and courage of the Jewish people, aware of the great achievements in creating the State of Israel, most of all impressed by the determination that from whatever source discrimination in all its forms must be fought.” Presumably that does not include the Palestinians.

Brown went on to make James Purnell (chairman of Labour Friends of Israel 2002-2004), secretary of state for culture, media and sport, giving him oversight over the British Broadcasting Corporation (state owned BBC often accused of lacking impartiality); and the rest of the British media – ‘a state within a state.’ The media controls public opinion and therefore this is not an act to be ignored. It was the BBC that constantly took elements of my research and turned it around, in order to counteract that research and support their secret group history.

Even recently following my letter to Geoffrey Cox a programme segment occurred on BBC radio 4 (‘Woman’s Hour’) which is questionable as to its source and certainly if that resulted from my letter, it only proves false information is held somewhere, in violation of the law. The cancer research was also plundered (New Scientist letter). Following publication of the first two volumes of Theatre Earth books (2001), the powers that be were so spooked by the research into the Minoans that besides the BBC programs, Channel 4 put out a news bulletin! – they were that spooked. What this illustrated was a highly controlled media, with Jewish interests given the nature of the research on the Minoans and the tribes of Israel, if not the stolen Mysteries of the Woman.

Brown’s Middle East minister was Kim Howells a former Chair of Labour Friends of Israel, which is generally viewed as a ladder to political success and where Freemasonry offers similar mutual friendship with benefits. The Labour Party’s policy-defining Smith Institute was heavily influenced by the Israeli lobby. Lord Haskel the chairman was a member of the Parliamentary Executive of the Labour Friends of Israel. The Smith Institute’s board included Baroness Meta Ramsay, a long-time MI6 intelligence officer who was the House of Lords chairman of Labour Friends of Israel. Tony Blair after he left office became the Quartet’s Envoy to the Middle East, despite his obvious conflict of interest.

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown a mainstream journalist was the only one with courage to question Labour Friends of Israel: “such lobbyists and their back room influence should make us very uneasy” (03.12.2007). She asked: “…can someone explain what exactly is the role of the Labour Friends of Israel (LFI) in our political life? And its twin the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) too.” Going on to say: “…In an open democracy, we are entitled to make such queries – indeed, it is a duty…” She went on to refer to David Abrahams and Lord Levy and the cash for honours investigations. Referring to John Mendelsohn a fund raiser for Gordon Brown, she stated: “Mendelsohn is a passionate Zionist” and “…one of the best-connected power brokers…” further “…so we can assume LFI plays a part in shaping our foreign policies in the Middle East…” She bravely went on “…I would venture to suggest that Tony Blair’s abject performance during the last Israeli assault on Lebanon was partly the result of the special relationship he had with LFI. It is astonishing that we have allowed it to spread through the corridors of power and infuse the air we breathed there…”

In 2008 80% of Conservative MPs were members of Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) according to their political director. At the time CFI stated “our members give financial support and campaigning help where it matters” (Author’s emphasis). This is in effect ‘a state within a state.’ David Cameron as an MP when Leader of the Conservative Party nailed his declaration to the mast when he stated: “I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative Friend of Israel; and I am proud of the key role CFI plays within our Party” (author’s emphasis). How far did this key role play in his decision to have a referendum on Brexit? If and when Britain leaves the EU it must become the junior partner to the Israeli-US partnership. You have to question the motivation for a Referendum. Britain after Brexit will be stuck with ‘a state within a state’ with democracy a ruse. On the other hand if we remain, then we are left with an un-elected undemocratic hierarchy in Brussels – a case of boiled or hung I would suggest.

Even the Liberal Party have a parliamentary Friends of Israel group. Its prime objective at least in 2008 was “to influence the Party’s Middle East policy…” The revisionist history peddled on their website at that time is rather jaw dropping claiming it was a ‘myth’ that ‘Israel “occupies” the West Bank’ and a ‘myth’ that ‘the Jews created the refugee problem by expelling the Palestinians.’ A truer account is given elsewhere (Theatre Earth vol. 1, p.474 -495).

There are more jaw dropping revisionist accounts on websites such as the Christian Friends of Israel. The problem with Christianity is that it never touched down with reality. The ascension or in terms of physics, the de-materialisation of Jesus, could not have occurred since it would have caused an atomic explosion to wipe out the entire Middle East; after all a small pot of matter and not an entire body de-materialized at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and wiped out those cities. You read statements like “The British Empire disappeared because she was no longer the friend of the Jewish people, but became her enemy, using both her Navy and Air Force to try to stop the Holocaust survivors from reaching the Promised Land.” Actually it was the Zionists in Palestine, who did not want mainly impoverished European Jewry, unless they were rich or had some advantageous skill set, to further the state of Israel.

The evangelical church in America became embedded into politics, which is not co-incidental as a universal religious and political kingdom is being sought and which it seems virtually all western countries have signed up to. This psychological case of ‘ONE-NESS’ will result in constant wars, where Israel irrespective of its actions will be given “truly special status” as Benita Ferrero Waldner, the EU’s external relations commissioner stated in 2008. I have warned in my books, where all this is headed. Max Jakobson of the Twentieth Century Fund (1993) in ‘The United Nations in the 1990s: A Second Chance? Claimed: “…a world order would have to be a harsh dictatorship.” The Jews claim they hold the root of all religions (well no – not Reincarnation and the Woman’s final secret – The Secret History of European Union vol.2 p.444). In the psychological case of ONE-NESS everybody is equal as in the case of communism or collective, but to quote Animal Farm “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” In short communism for the masses overseen by a privileged elite – not much change from the present.

If organisations such as the Friends of Israel are working on a ONE-NESS politically then other organisations have been working continuously since World War I on a religious ONE-NESS. John D. Rockefeller Jr., was involved since the 1940s in a “religion of the future” – actually it’s a very old religion based on Nature’s Laws and will be harsher than any sharia law. The Churches program and ultimate goal allied to the political program was given thus: “… a duly constituted world government of delegated powers: an international legislative body, an international court with adequate jurisdiction, international administrative bodies with necessary powers and adequate international police forces and provision for enforcing its worldwide economic authority…” (The Secret History of European Union vol.2, p.333).

As in China currently certain religions will not be tolerated in the world order of ONE-NESS. China is facing growing criticism over its persecution of some Muslim minority groups, huge numbers of whom are allegedly being held in internment camps. In August 2018, a UN committee heard that up to one million Uighur Muslims and other Muslim groups could be being detained in the western Xinjiang region, where they’re said to be undergoing “re-education” programmes.

Uighur Muslims and other Muslim groups sent for “re-education” and separated from their families

A discernible pattern emerges, once historical truth emerges, where escalating and manufactured world ‘crises’ have served as convenient launching points for incrementally larger pieces of the world government agenda to be assembled through strategies of secrecy and  engrenage (gearing). One does not associate the Early and Late Minoans 1500 BC with today’s crisis but the theft of the Woman’s Mysteries and their concealment in a secret group has everything to do with today’s crisis. She didn’t come from here.

As with World War I and II and even Brexit, the plan to wear down the populous until they willingly accept a solution offered by the world government was referred to by Henry Kissinger, when he alluded to this pattern of crises: “…The outcome in Iraq will depend on something that a German philosopher, Emmanuel Kant said…someday there will be universal peace. The only question is whether it comes about through human insight, or whether it comes about…through a series of catastrophes of such magnitude that people are so exhausted that they have no other choice.”

Actually usually species extinction stops play, if one is to learn anything from past cycles.

Eustace Mullins claimed that only five men really rule this world. In psychological terms the Antisocial Personality make up 1% of the population but infect 20% with their insanity. The names of Rothschild and Rockefeller constantly came up in the research, but I am convinced that the real problem lies with high initiates of a secret fraternity (“The Guardians”) like Dr Falk in the past, unseen and yet they convince a few powerful men, with their ideas. I have in The Secret History of European Union and prior books, chased down this secret fraternity. When you analyse the origin of ideas in history, you can see a pattern deriving from initiates. Men like Dr Falk who initiated Weishaupt founder of the Illuminati and Cagliostro. Men like Leo Srauss, who spawned the neoconservatives, but was able to develop his ideas only because of his patron and the Rockefeller Foundation. Strauss used Plato as his template, but Plato as we have seen was initiated into the secret fraternity and in this way, ideas re-cycle and perpetuate the misunderstandings of the Late Minoans.

Those who cannot remember history are destined to repeat it.